The Commercial Real Estate Alpha Site

By JR Lephew, Director of Affordable Housing at Partner Engineering and Science, Inc.

Published April 1, 2025, on GlobeSt.com. <—- CLICK HERE for complete article

Stakeholders in the multifamily residential space, particularly developers who rely upon federal funding, and HUD by proxy, are starting to feel the effects of the new administration’s programmatic and budget cuts.

Despite the challenges, there is optimism that there are viable ways to address the funding gaps, allowing affordable housing and eco-friendly development to continue progressing. The industry’s ability to innovate and remain flexible will be key to overcoming these difficulties and achieving long-term success.

In his latest GlobeSt article, JR Lephew offers strategies to overcome funding obstacles in the new landscape of multifamily housing.

Going, Going, Gone…. but Not Forgotten!

The immediate fallout from the loss of key government funding, chiefly those tied to green programs and energy efficiency incentives, leaves stakeholders scrambling to fill the enormous void left by these cuts. Gone are the days of making razor-thin deals pencil by filling the gap in the capital stack with federal dollars supporting solar initiatives, energy efficiency and more recently climate resiliency. It remains to be seen whether these will be incremental losses and changes, or catastrophic shortfalls. And the same ill fate may soon ail state funding as well.

Value Engineering

While not always ideal, value engineering with tact is a way to trim excessive costs while maintaining integrity and intent in a scope of work and budget. Even if energy efficiency incentives are no longer readily available, the strategies and energy efficient design approach the industry has learned during the ESG boom can still be carried into a project. The efficient and collaborative design approach and resulting cost savings that can be realized on rent, utilities, and engineering/building operations are minimal added costs in today’s environment.

Feasibility and Viability of Properties’ Needs

Further, while it is nice to rely on rebate incentives to pay for more efficient appliances and mechanicals, the fact of the matter is that an energy efficient design boosts a property’s bottom line, income, and value without breaking the bank as they once did. And even if a green certification is not in the cards, the marketing boost and rent multiplier alone make continuing to pursue these avenues feasible and viable.

Creative Financing Strategy

Recently, more creative financing and funding strategies have also started to emerge as developers try to find ways to fund projects. Multiple equity and debt sources have always been necessary, but bundling Historic Tax Credits, and Housing Agency financing along with traditional debt is becoming an effective approach.

Per Scott Chiu, National Client Manager at Partner Engineering and Science, Inc., “In a landmark deal, a first of its kind 4% and 9% LIHTC and HUD finance/FHA-insured combination strategy was implemented on an affordable project in San Francisco, which has laid the framework for future opportunities leveraging this approach.” RAD and Section 18 Blends and similar product vehicles are other examples of thinking holistically about capital strategy and outlay.

In Conclusion

Whether they are recapitalization events, acquisitions/preservations, or new construction deals, it is all hands on deck to ensure affordable housing is not left behind. Despite the challenges, there is optimism that there are viable ways to address the funding gaps, allowing affordable housing and eco-friendly development to continue progressing. The industry’s ability to innovate and remain flexible will be key to overcoming these difficulties and achieving long-term success.

Certain portions of the article have been left out. For complete article, please visit this link or others at the beginning or within the article.